I won’t delve into the
details of the growing scandal at the U. S. Central Command. Others can do that better than I. But it suffices to say intelligence
analysts were pressured not to be so serious in their assessments of ISIS.
Yes, given the events of
recent weeks and months, this is no trivial scandal.
And, of course, the
question immediately arises: how responsible is Obama for this? I consider it doubtful he was directly
responsible. But indirectly
responsible? Oh, yes.
I have already noted last week that
Obama is not interested in intelligence on terrorism that does not fit his rosy
world view. (And sometimes my
timing on posts is amazing if I say so myself. And I do.) It
is a well known phenomenon that if an executive treats with disdain unpleasant
information and those who provide it to him, then those under him will be all
the more reluctant to provide him with unpleasant information, no matter how
needful it may be.
Whether by intent or by the
withering pressure of group think and of trying to avoid displeasing one’s
superiors, Obama’s Hear No Evil, See No Evil attitude has resulted in Speak No
Evil beneath him in our military intelligence.
And that, in turn, has
helped enable ISIS.
No comments:
Post a Comment