I rarely recommend any article from the Washington Post, and I am not privy to goings on at Truro Church, but there is an interesting and apparently fair article on the resignation of Tory Baucum from Truro Church and how that church is dealing with the aftermath.
The article goes into some different viewpoints behind the causes of the resignation, and I am in no position to get into that. But it does seem clear that Baucum was tyrannical in dealing with some or most of his staff. The Vestry was alerted. It, through the Senior Warden, confronted Baucum. And, whether or not the confrontation precipitated it, Baucum resigned.
Now one could argue that Baucum should have been dealt with sooner. No form of church governance that relies on imperfect people will be perfect. But Baucum eventually was dealt with, and Truro Church is to be commended for that.
Not all churches can say the same. Among the reasons are that many churches lack a local church governing body with enough independence to say no to a pastor. Other churches lack an authority above and outside the local church to say no. Many churches lack both. Therefore many churches are ruled by the pastor, which relies too much on one man and invites abuse of power. Now there are godly men that lead their churches well with that much power in their hands. But trusting one man too much to lead a church can and does result in shipwreck for individual Christians and for local churches. The same could be said about putting too much power into the hands of a paid staff as I’ve seen for myself.
One of the strengths of Anglicanism in an American context is local churches have both governmental checks to keep a parish and its leader in line. At the local level, there is the Vestry. Above the local level, there is the Bishop. And both have the power to say no to an errant Rector.
I know what some are thinking: “That form of governance did not save The Episcopal Church.” And that is correct. No form of church governance can save a church if the leaven of apostasy is not confronted and cleaned out early enough. Good church governance structures are tools, not cure-alls.
Nonetheless, the recent events at Truro Church demonstrate Anglican church governance working well. And that includes Baucum’s erstwhile “school of peace and reconciliation.” In that case, authority above the local parish in the form of orthodox bishops stepped in and put that down.
Now I am not saying, “Look at us Anglicans. We govern ourselves so much better than thou” . . . although I am tempted so to do. What I am saying is that it is important to have bodies of authority able and willing to correct and if necessary dismiss errant pastors and staff. And those bodies must be both at the local church level and above the local church. The recent years at Truro Church have demonstrated that well.
