Thursday, January 08, 2015

Truth About Islam From . . . The New Yorker??

Yes, George Packer of The New Yorker, of all publications, gets it:

The murders today in Paris are not a result of France's failure to assimilate two generations of Muslim immigrants from its former colonies. They're not about French military action against the Islamic State in the Middle East, or the American invasion of Iraq before that. They're not part of some general wave of nihilistic violence in the economically depressed, socially atomized, morally hollow West--the Paris version of Newtown or Oslo. Least of all should they be "understood" as reactions to disrespect for religion on the part of irresponsible cartoonists.

They are only the latest blows delivered by an ideology that has sought to achieve power through terror for decades. It's the same ideology that sent Salman Rushdie into hiding for a decade under a death sentence for writing a novel, then killed his Japanese translator and tried to kill his Italian translator and Norwegian publisher. The ideology that murdered three thousand people in the U.S. on September 11, 2001. The one that butchered Theo van Gogh in the streets of Amsterdam, in 2004, for making a film. The one that has brought mass rape and slaughter to the cities and deserts of Syria and Iraq. That massacred a hundred and thirty-two children and thirteen adults in a school in Peshawar last month. That regularly kills so many Nigerians, especially young ones, that hardly anyone pays attention.

Because the ideology is the product of a major world religion, a lot of painstaking pretzel logic goes into trying to explain what the violence does, or doesn't, have to do with Islam. Some well-meaning people tiptoe around the Islamic connection, claiming that the carnage has nothing to do with faith, or that Islam is a religion of peace, or that, at most, the violence represents a "distortion" of a great religion....

A religion is not just a set of texts but the living beliefs and practices of its adherents. Islam today includes a substantial minority of believers who countenance, if they don't actually carry out, a degree of violence in the application of their convictions that is currently unique.

We can argue whether or not the violence is inherent in Islam. (I contend it is.  Look at its history.)  But George Packer is right.  And those still in denial about Islam are engaging in foolishness - deadly foolishness.

----


A big hat tip to Ace.

Tuesday, January 06, 2015

What do Feminazis and the KKK have in common?

Yes, my question might be slightly inflammatory, but if the shoe fits . . . .

The short answer is an undue, even demanding, bias that accusations of rape be believed without question.  Of course, this demand primarily applies when used as a weapon against hated adversaries - heterosexual men in the case of Feminazis and black men in the case of the KKK.

Automatic belief of rape accusations was a central principle of the KKK’s war on rape, too. This was one of the things that most shocked Ida B Wells, the early twentieth-century African-American journalist and civil-rights activist. ‘The word of the accuser is held to be true’, she said, which means that ‘the rule of law [is] reversed, and instead of proving the accused to be guilty, the [accused] must prove himself innocent’. Wells and others were startled by the level of belief in the accusers of black men, and by the damning of anyone who dared to question such accusations, which was taken as an attack on the accuser’s ‘virtue’.

And there are additional parallels, both instructive and disturbing, between the KKK and “rape culture” activists.  So do go read . . . if you can handle it.

Hat tip to Instapundit.

---


NOTE: One reason I use the term “Feminazis” here is that not all feminists buy into “rape culture” witch hunting.  So I did not want to use the latter term.  I do respect those feminists thoughtful enough to defend rightful protections of the accused.

Monday, January 05, 2015

Sorry If I Offend in 2015 . . . Or Not


During the ten, soon eleven, years of this blog, I have oft deliberated on how aggressive I should be with the truth and with my opinions . . . which rarely diverge, although it does happen.

I am self-aware enough to know tact is not one of my strong points.  And I know that we are to “speak the truth in love” with neither truth nor love being optional, and I do wrestle with that scripture.  So, believe it or not, I pull punches often.  Sometimes I think I best leave a topic alone.  Or I sleep on something before ranting opining on it.

But although what the world needs now is love, sweet love, it seems to be perhaps even more in need of truth at the moment.  For 2014 was the year of the lie, particularly lefty lies.

Students of Leftist politics, such as my unfortunate self, have long known that many/most Leftists put their causes and their narratives above inconvenient facts and truths.  This first truly hit me when I analyzed news coverage in both my work and studies during the 80’s.  The lies I saw were so brazen and pervasive it practically made me sick at times.  And the culture has gotten worse since.  The past year stands out in that regard with “Hands up, don’t shoot,” with “rape culture” lies and exaggerations, with Obama continuing to be Obama, with “News” Media continuing to engage in propagandizing more than informing, etc.

But truth will win in the end.  Yes, I do need to remind myself of that frequently.  And the best remedy for lies is the proclamation of truth. So I think 2015 is a time to become more aggressive with the truth, and I intend so to do.

Now, of course, nothing offends like truth and inconvenient facts.  And in asserting the truth, we, nay I, need to be careful not to add needless offense to the truth.  But lies are so pervading and warping our culture, the need for the truth is urgent.  And I intend so to guide this blog and my even more inflammatory twitter account as well.

And if telling it like it is offends . . . well, too bad.

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

New Year’s Eve, an excerpt from Pilot Point

In Pilot Point, I use a New Year’s Eve as the occasion when Clayton Hays finally asks out his neighbor, Leslie Johns.  And I introduce the dances held at St. Thomas (Aquinas) Catholic Church.

I attended a dance or two there when I lived near Pilot Point.  Like Clayton, I was slightly awkward.  And like him, I noticed most there were older then me.  (I was about 30 at the time.)  There was lots of silver hair.  But most of the older people sure danced better than I could.

My experience inspired me to use the parish dances in my novel, and not just as a setting for Clayton and Leslie’s relationship.   One theme of Pilot Point is the interaction between youth, time, and old age.  And the relation is not always what one may expect.  The young may be old in some ways and vice versa.  As I saw for myself, the silver haired can retain a lot of youth.  Clayton Hays, on the other hand, lost his youth too quickly.

The changing of the year prompts reflection upon one’s past and future.  And so it is with Clayton.

But enough background.  Enjoy the excerpt.  And have a Happy New Year.

-----

         Two days after Christmas, Clayton noticed Leslie’s car was back in her driveway. So at dusk, he walked over to her house.

         “Hi Clay,” she cheerfully answered the door. “Come on in.”

         “I saw you were back, so I thought I’d come over and say hello.”

         “Good. Glad to see ya.” She shut the door against the cold. “How was your Christmas working cattle?”

         “It was okay. It would have been a lot worse if Bowie’s truck heater didn’t work real well.”

         “Oh yeah. Wasn’t it cold Christmas Day? I was thinking about you out in the weather working cattle.”

         “It was pretty brisk.”

         “I imagine.”

         “How was your Christmas?”

         “Oh, the usual. You know, relatives you’re so glad to see just once a year.”

         Clayton smiled. Leslie told some more about Christmas with her family. And they just talked for a while.

         Then Leslie asked, “Now that Christmas is past, what are you doing for New Year’s?”

         “Not much.”

         “Why am I not surprised by that?” After a pause, she said, “I think the Catholics are having a dance New Year’s Eve over at St. Thomas’s. They do every year. I’ve always been Baptist or Anglican, but I have to hand it to them, they’re not against having a good time. I imagine that will be a nice dance. And I don’t think it’s going to be formal or anything like the city people’s parties.”

         Clayton nodded. Then it suddenly occurred to him that Leslie was hinting. He stalled for time. “I guess I’d make a lousy Catholic.”

         Leslie laughed. Clayton kept thinking. He figured he ought to be more sociable even if it was against his nature. And he figured he ought to treat Leslie right and that she did need to go out, especially on New Year’s Eve. And he figured Bowie had a point. [While feeding cattle on Christmas Day, Bowie gave Clayton a hard time about not yet asking out Leslie. – Ed.]

         So he said, “I can’t dance worth anything, certainly not like Catholics. But if you like, I would like to take you to the dance.”

         Leslie smirked. “I would like that.”



         Clayton paid Leslie’s and his way in at the door of the St. Thomas Community Center. They walked tentatively into the dimly lit hall and took seats at the back of the room.

         They tried to make small talk there. But after a while, they were just awkwardly quiet.

         Clayton looked around. He noticed there was hardly anyone in the room under forty. Heads of gray and white hair were scattered among the tables and across the dance floor, throughout the room. “We’re practically the youngest folks here,” he remarked.

         “Yeah. Kind of nice, isn’t it?”

         “Yeah. It’s different.”

         After a long while, he finally asked, “Do you want to dance?”

         “I thought you’d never ask.”

         Clayton was stiff and awkward as they danced. He was trying hard not to step on her feet—and that was about all he was doing right.

         “It has been a long time since you danced, hasn’t it.”

         “Yes,” he admitted sheepishly.

         “Just relax and follow me. And don’t worry about stepping on me. I’m tough.”

         “Okay.”

         He relaxed some. Soon he was almost enjoying dancing with Leslie.

         After two dances, they sat back down and talked.

         But before long, during a quiet song, they found themselves quiet, watching the other, older folks dance.

         “They dance so well, don’t they?” Leslie said.

         “Yes. They do.”

         They kept watching them slowly, gracefully glide across the floor. There was peace in their steps and quiet joy in their faces.

         Later, when the band lit into a lively tune, Leslie said, “Let’s get back out there.”

         “Okay.”

         Once Clayton, under Leslie’s guidance, had gotten the step and rhythm of the dance down, he watched the others around them. Although they had heads of gray, their dancing was spry. He watched a white-haired couple smiling at each other and not missing a step. Another mature couple was even showing off a bit. He smiled and looked at Leslie, who was also enjoying the young/old couples. Being among them dancing with Leslie made him almost feel like a kid. For a dance, they were all young.

         When the band finished the song, the leader announced, “Twenty minutes until the New Year!” The crowd clapped.

         The band then played a mellower tune, and Leslie and Clayton stayed out to dance that one.

         The announcement of the impending year put him in a reflective mood as they led each other around the floor. The time caught him by surprise. He did not know the New Year was that close. He thought about how time is that way—it steadily marches, and, before one knows it, it is gone.

         He reflected how time had passed him by—how he lost his childhood early, how the now hazy years that followed passed so quickly. He hardly ever was a teenager. Then there was college and two shining years [SPOILER OMITTED]. And the years in Alaska, too, had already become a dark haze.

         Now, he was slowly dancing with Leslie. Time had brought them to this dance.

         In spite of himself, he was now in good cadence with Leslie and with the other couples. He watched them as they floated around him, their warm hearts undiminished by their heads of gray. He could see the glow of love in their faces. They had left the struggles of long life off this floor.

         He found himself feeling that Leslie and he were one of them, slowly gliding among the couples with time floating by them all. As he watched the glowing faces and the graceful steps from the older pairs young for this night, he found himself with them, and with Leslie, in a slow dance of time.

         He felt he belonged in this dance. Yet he knew they must all soon leave the floor.

         Before he knew it came, “Ten… nine… eight… seven… six… five… four… three… two… one!” And there was the noise of a passing year and the heartfelt singing of Auld Lang Syne.

         As he stood beside Leslie, he saw all the couples kiss each other and look at each other with sentimental eyes. He turned his eyes toward Leslie. She was looking at him. She turned her eyes down, blushing a little. He felt awkward. But he leaned over as Leslie looked back up and gave her a gentle kiss. They smiled at each other, a little shyly.

         The first dance of the New Year began, and they stayed out on the dance floor and joined in.

         It seemed strange to Clayton that a year had ended, and now it was another year. He gazed out at the other couples. He saw faces of joy and contentment. They seemed at peace with the passage of years.

         But he could not comprehend that peace. So many of his years were lost. So many were too much like the ones before.

         Yet, as he and Leslie danced close to each other, among the young/old couples, he had a feeling he could not fathom that, in spite of himself and his past, this year was going to be different.

-----

By the way, I notice they are still dancing Catholics at St. Thomas.  They are holding a New Year’s Eve dance this very evening.

I invite you to like the Facebook page for Pilot Point.


Pilot Point is available in both paperback and Kindle at Amazon.

Monday, December 29, 2014

In Defense of Jane Shaw

Dr. Jane Shaw, the new Stanford Dean of Religious Life has gotten a bit of attention lately for saying the following.

I don’t think church is to be more churchy. I think church is about, anyone should be welcome. I’m really interested in how you welcome many different kind of constituencies, certainly not convert them, not even necessarily to do religion all the time.

I’ve even heard Rush Limbaugh refer to this and give her a bit of a hard time.

Now it will not surprise that Dr. Shaw (as I’ve always addressed her) is not my flavor of Anglican.  And I should give the disclaimer I have not seen her in action for some years.  But I was a frequent worshipper at the Chapel of New College Oxford back in Michaelmas Term 2007 when she was the Chaplain.  So I can speak to how she applied her philosophy of church there.

And I have to say that, unlike many who like to use the word, she was genuinely inclusive.  She made me feel very welcome and was even enthusiastic on occasion in so doing.  (And that even though I kidded her about a global warming sermon she gave at Christ Church on the coldest, most miserable Sunday of term.)

She stuck to the traditional liturgy and did not play any games with it that I noticed.  Even the sermons there were good.  In her recent comments, she mentioned use of art.  And, if I recall correctly, one of the guest sermons that term looked at a painting, a Rembrandt I think, and drew a touching Christian message out of it.  It was excellent.

In sum, she conducted services in a way that made even this hard-core liturgically nit-picking orthodox Anglican feel included and edified.  She certainly helped me to learn and worship that dark cold autumn.

Now I understand how some could read her comments and envision her turning a college chapel into a circus that would horrify and drive away the orthodox.  But my experience at Oxford in 2007, at least, indicates that is neither her style nor intent.


And, as much as we differ on any number of matters, I am still grateful for her conducting the Chapel of New College in manner that greatly included and blessed me.

Why the Heck Was Heather Cook Made a Bishop?

No, I am not going to condemn Heather Cook for her alleged hit-and-run, at least not the run part.  When one is involved in a very bad accident, it can be very traumatic and disorienting and lead to immediate unwise decisions.  And she reportedly did return to the scene of the accident within 20 minutes.  So I will withhold judgment, at least for now.

But I do denounce The Episcopal “Church” and its Diocese of Maryland for making her a “bishop” in the first place.  Why?

In September 2010, nearly four years to the day before she'd become Maryland's first female Episcopal bishop, Cook was pulled over in Caroline County.

Police at the time said she blew a BAC of .27, or over three times the legal limit, when given a breathalyzer.

In her car, police said they found a bottle of whiskey, a bottle of wine, and a marijuana pipe reported MyEasternShoreMD.com.

And four years after that, she is made a bishop?  Really?


The Episcopal “Church,” with its enabling, shares blame for the tragic death of Tom Palermo.

Saturday, December 27, 2014

10th Anniversary: Holy Innocents and The Dark Side of Christmas

With tomorrow Sunday being the Feast of Holy Innocents, I think it meet to point back to what I think is one of the better posts of this blog’s ten years, “Holy Innocents and the Dark Side of Christmas,” posted in 2007.


I think those annoyed by the artificial, mandatory happy, happy, HAPPY-ness forced on us at Christmas will particularly appreciate it.  Enjoy.