World
Relief continues its increasingly liberal political ways by taking out a full-page ad in the Washington Post expressing deep, deep concern about Trump
pulling back on the import of those lovely refugees until it can be determined
how to better vet them to make sure they really are all that lovely. Trump is so mean!
Now
on its face, the open letter is not that objectionable. Yes, we should be concerned about
genuine refugees. Certainly, we
should pray for God to grant our leaders wisdom.
So
I am not going to assume motives behind this letter and those who signed
it. But I will vent a bit on what
this open letter smells like.
World Relief and Co are “deeply concerned”? Well, I’m going to express my deep, deep concern, too.
And
what this letter smells like is a passive-aggressive attack on Trump’s attempts
to protect us. That “concerned”
line at the beginning is a tip-off.
If a modern evangelical leader ever tells you he is “concerned” about
you, watch your back! I certainly
can remember being fed that line while I was being stabbed in the back one
unhappy occasion. I was naïve back
then. Experiences with certain evangelical
churchly bureaucrats make me slightly cynical now. Yes, I admit it.
Oh,
but World Relief and company are not just “concerned,” they are “deeply concerned.” Heck, you better pray that getting
stabbed in the back is all that happens.
The
whole letter smells like weasel words to indulge in political attack while
retaining the pretense that they aren’t getting involved in partisan politics
at all. They are just expressing
Christian “concern.”
Where
was all this concern when terrorists and rapeugees were invading and attacking
Europe and beginning to invade and attack us with the help of Obama?
So
excuse me if this cynic is not buying World Relief’s “concern” now. It smells like the usual enabling of
invaders who would make us less safe, not to mention less American – liberal
enabling dressed up in polyester leisure suits or whatever evangelical leaders
wear now. (They never did know how
to dress.)
Maybe
it would be better to stuff all the posturing concern, complete with full page
ads in the Washington Post, and stick to being a supposedly Christian relief
agency. What a novel idea! Surely that is a better use of
donations . . . and less likely to drive donors away. And, yes, I would not be shocked at all if donations to
World Relief now decrease.
But
I can be dreadfully practical and downright hard-hearted about such things. It seems to be really compassionate,
you have to posture in full page ads.
I admit I lack such compassion.
As
for ACNA Bishop Stewart Ruch, who signed this with “Anglican Church in North
America” under his name, I will be slightly more gracious and assume the best
of motives. He certainly does have
a record of reaching out to refugees and deserves said assumption. But his signature as a bishop of ACNA
is nonetheless a highly questionable use of his position.
Further,
it takes us a step closer to open division in ACNA over immigration and refugees,
a danger of which I have already warned.