No, I do not want to jump
to conclusions regarding the above question. Yes, there are abusive twitter users who could use a good
banning as at almost any popular social media platform.
Nonetheless, Twitter
should be watched closely in 2016. For they are implementing a stricter
policy against abusive users. And
the question is whether definitions of “abuse” and “direct attacks” and the
like will be used and twisted to ban legitimate speech, particularly by
conservatives. Such terms are
easily manipulated.
For example, when I
rightly call out #BlackLivesMatter or certain members of the same as
#BlackRacists, will that be categorized by Twitter as “abuse” or a “direct
attack”?
I doubt it. But I would be naïve to ignore that a Social
Justice Warrior mentality opposed to genuine free speech has infected society,
including Twitter. So, again,
Twitter should be watched, particularly in this election year.
I am not alone in having
this concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment