Something modern
totalitarians have in common is any opposition to their designs is an
unprincipled attack on the Volk and
on the Fatherland! And any such
opposition is inspired by foreigners and, of course, The JOOOOOS!
And thus is it with opposition
to Obama enabling deal with genocidal Iran. Why would anyone oppose that? . . . unless they were in
league with foreigners and JOOOOOOS!
Cue Barack Obama’s
fanboys at the Daily Kos.
Daily Kos is calling Chuck Schumer
an Israeli Jew Traitor for opposing Iran deal. Seriously: http://t.co/JWxHdXgZeY
pic.twitter.com/kf02VlM2Ny
—
Jeff B@AoSHQDD (@EsotericCD) August
9, 2015
Yes, I am siding with
Senator Schumer here. Sit down and
take some smelling salts if you need to.
Cue Obama in saying
Republicans and hardline Iranians are in league.
"In fact, it's those hard-liners who are most
comfortable with the status quo," Obama said Wednesday afternoon.
"It's those hard-liners chanting "death to America" who have
been most opposed to the deal."
"They're making common cause with the Republican
caucus," Obama said to laughter and wild applause.
Yes, wild applause.
Praise the Dear Leader for exposing the connections of Running Dog
Republican Traitors with nefarious foreigners!
Cue any number of thinly
veiled accusations of duel loyalty and JOOOO money from the Obama regime’s
various fronts. Check out this
from Honest Reporting (scroll to item 2) for a taste of that.
This is becoming too much
for even the Left-of-Center Tablet whose editors have sounded the alarm and
with passion:
What we increasingly can’t stomach—and feel obliged
to speak out about right now—is the use of Jew-baiting and other blatant and
retrograde forms of racial and ethnic prejudice as tools to sell a political
deal, or to smear those who oppose it. Accusing Senator Schumer of loyalty to a
foreign government is bigotry, pure and simple. Accusing Senators and
Congressmen whose misgivings about the Iran deal are shared by a majority of
the U.S. electorate of being agents
of a foreign power, or of selling
their votes to shadowy lobbyists, or of acting contrary
to the best interests of the United States, is the kind of naked appeal to
bigotry and prejudice that would be familiar in the politics of the pre-Civil
Rights Era South.
This use of anti-Jewish incitement as a political
tool is a sickening new development in American political discourse, and we
have heard too much of it lately—some coming, ominously, from our own White
House and its representatives. Let’s not mince words: Murmuring about “money”
and “lobbying” and “foreign interests” who seek to drag America into war is a
direct attempt to play the dual-loyalty
card. It’s the kind of dark, nasty stuff we might expect to hear at a white
power rally, not from the President of the United States—and it’s gotten so
blatant that even many of us who are generally sympathetic to the
administration, and even this deal, have been shaken by it.
We do not accept the idea that Senator Schumer or
anyone else is a fair target for racist incitement, anymore than we accept the
idea that the basic norms of political discourse in this country do not apply
to Jews. Whatever one feels about the merits of the Iran deal, sales techniques
that call into question the patriotism of American Jews are examples of
bigotry—no matter who does it. On this question, we should all stand in defense
of Senator Schumer.
But then the Tablet is
published by JOOOOOOS!
In all seriousness, the
editors of the Tablet are right. I
think it important to add and emphasize that this is how totalitarians act,
from the dictators of Venezuela and Cuba who blame their failures on the Yanqui and yes, the Jews, too, to the 20th Century Nazi and Communist regimes that
plagued Europe. Any failure of and
any opposition to the regime is never the fault of the Glorious Leaders but of
foreigners and Jews and of traitors in league with them.
It is beyond sad that here in the United States we
now have a regime that so conducts itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment