No, I did not out of a
morning fog get that “6” up-side-down.
As I did yesterday with a youth group, I choose to talk about John 3:19. It is odd this verse is not well known
coming so soon after the famous John 3:16. But you shall soon see why.
We’ll start with 3:16 (And I use the English Standard Version here.)
For God so loved the world, that he gave
his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal
life.
Yay! Oh sorry. I got carried away with that verse being plastered
everywhere, even (especially) at football games. And we all love that verse. And it is good news we all desperately need. So . . . YAY!
17 For God did not send his Son into the world to
condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.
We do not hear
that verse quite as often as verse 16, but we do hear it a lot. And no wonder – it is very encouraging,
too. I am certainly glad Jesus
came to save people, particularly your humble blogger.
18 Whoever believes in him
is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he
has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.
Now we do not
hear that verse quite so often, do we?
Talking about non-believers being condemned does not make for a pleasant
sermon or Sunday School lesson.
Aversion to such unpleasantness is not just a liberal affliction. I’ve run in more orthodox church circles
most of my life, and I’ve heard this verse much less than verses 16 and 17.
But people need
to know that rejecting or ignoring Jesus has awful consequences, and that not
because God is eager to condemn – the previous verses teach the opposite – but
because the natural consequence of foolishly rejecting the Giver of life is
death.
Now John gets
even more unpleasant.
19 And this is the judgment:
the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than
the light because their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does wicked
things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be
exposed.
These verses
are even more unpopular. I have
heard these verses taught before, but not often, even though these come so soon
after John 3:16. I am somewhat familiar with these verses anyway; yet, to be honest, a few days ago I was not aware
that they came just after John 3:16.
I was made
aware while reading John 3 during my daily office. And one of the strengths of using a good lectionary, as I
was, is that virtually the whole Bible gets read in context. That is also a good reason to read
whole books and the whole Bible through.
Both the context and the unpleasant bits are less likely to be
overlooked.
The timing of
my being made aware was providential as we have been reading John Stott’s Basic Christianity in the aforementioned
youth group. Stott wisely warns
early in his book (where the group is now) against the response of most people
to Christianity – to not seek the truth about Jesus and about the Christian faith at
all. And he notes that one reason
many do not seek is that they are afraid that if they find, there will have to
be changes in their lives.
It is
interesting that that many non-Christians instinctively know that if they come
to faith that there will indeed have to be change, particularly a rejection of
pet sins. They are correct! Salvation is a package, and rejection
of sin is part of the package.
Nonetheless the
fact that many choose not to even seek the light and the truth because they do
not want to give up their dark deeds is neither pleasant to hear nor to
teach. So I am very thankful that
I was reminded of verses 19 and 20 so I could use them to teach this. I’d rather St. John take the blame
instead of grumpy Mark.
But is it not
interesting that John 3:19-20 is heard so much less often than John 3:16 just three
verses before. Orthodox or not, we
just do not want to hear or teach that our own attachment to sin can keep us
from seeking Jesus. Better to be
more uplifting, not to mention polite.
But politeness
neither saves nor sanctifies.
Wait till you get to John 3:36.
ReplyDeleteOF course if you are really a glutton for punishment you could discuss the political ramifications of Deuteronomy 17's instructions to the ruler on the organization of the modern large nation state.
Or you could take up John 8 with a dispensationalist, that always gets interesting.