Before the 2012 elections, the reported
unemployment rate dropped markedly with precious little to account for said
drop. Coming from this regime, the
drop was too convenient for me to believe. I suspected it was bogus (as I very briefly mentioned at the
time).
It now appears my suspicions were right.
The
decline — from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent in September [2012] — might
not have been all it seemed. The numbers, according to a reliable source, were
manipulated.
And
the Census Bureau, which does the unemployment survey, knew it.
Just
two years before the presidential election, the Census Bureau had caught an
employee fabricating data that went into the unemployment report, which is one
of the most closely watched measures of the economy.
And
a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that
it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and
continues today.
“He’s
not the only one,” said the source, who asked to remain anonymous for now but
is willing to talk with the Labor Department and Congress if asked.
The
Census employee caught faking the results is Julius Buckmon, according to
confidential Census documents obtained by The Post. Buckmon told me in an
interview this past weekend that he was told to make up information by
higher-ups at Census.
And the Instapundit reminds that Obama’s White
House took the Census Bureau under its wing during his first term. His take on this new revelation of
faked employment numbers?
So
with this and the IRS intimidation of the opposition, the asterisk on Obama’s
re-election gets bigger. . . .
I would add that the blatant vote fraud in urban precincts also makes that asterisk rather large.
And with the pattern of using the federal
government illegally and fraudulently to aid Obama and attack political opposition,
I’m beginning to wonder if Obama can be impeached for racketeering.
During the Clinton scandals, Bill that is, it was said that if Nixon had had Clinton's press, not only would he have finished his second term, but he would have been succeeded by Spiro Agnew. At least in the Clinton era, the MSM actually covered the scandals, though with the best possible spin. Now, crickets.
ReplyDelete